Angelkiss 168cm review - would I recommend one?
  • User avatar
    Zeero
    -- Veteran Member --
    -- Veteran Member --
    Posts: 161
    Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2021 12:41 pm

    Angelkiss 168cm review - would I recommend one?

    by Zeero » Tue Jul 21, 2026 9:09 pm

    I ordered her from Silicone Lovers. They're a good vendor with good customer service and attention to detail. They liaise with the dollmaker factories efficiently and we get good comms. I recommend them.

    I was particularly taken by the slim hourglass sexy figure of the 168cm, particularly her wide hips (factory photo attached). The price offered at Silicone Lovers was very attractive, being slightly cheaper than similar silicone dolls from quality makers like (names of competing manufacturers removed by moderator).

    Here's a timeline:

    11 Jan 2026 order placed
    ? March 2026 factory ran out of head I ordered, I ordered another one
    2 Apr factory packed and shipped out
    24 Apr 2026 delivered to my door

    So whilst the wait felt excruciating, it's well as expected.

    She came well packed and arrived safely without damage.

    Her joints are tight but move well, so far.

    I had ordered face freckles but the factory didn't appear to have applied it. I hadn't paid enough attention to it when I received the factory pictures for approval, so this error is partly down to me too.

    The skin texture on her hands and nipples is impressive. The body painting is impressive too. Am pleased so far. Below is a tally of PLUS and MINUS points.

    PLUS points
    1. Well-built body (we can expect WM to have lots of experience and knowhow to get this right)

    2. Great body painting

    3. Great skin texture on hands, nipples, feet (though these will be hidden by shoes and tights)


    Minus points
    1. Abysmal oral sex capability. The mouth is just a plain hole with zero appeal. Other quality dolls in this price range offer ROS. An Enhanced Mouth is offered in the package (apparently with a rubber tongue), but is missing

    2. The Love Hole Placement is very disappointing. Sex is doggy is hard work and not enjoyable

    3. Her gel boobs don't feel like gel - they feel firm as solid silicone

    She looks great as a static model. But action with her is nowhere as good as with the other girls form the other makers.

    So whilst she was at the cheaper end of 'quality' silicone dolls, the savings have not been worth it.

    Would I buy another one? Nope.

    Would I recommend you to buy one - Nope.

    But I do recommend Silicone Lovers as a vendor (this apparently will get me some brownie points with them too)


  • User avatar
    SsCoobyDoO
    -- Veteran Member --
    -- Veteran Member --
    Posts: 267
    Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 12:15 pm

    Re: Angelkiss 168cm review - would I recommend one?

    by SsCoobyDoO » Wed Jul 22, 2026 3:56 am

    Thanks for the review! I've been eyeing Angelkiss for a long time as I really like the looks of their dolls. But some negative reviews on quality made me opt for Irontech instead.
  • JasonMills
    -- Veteran Member --
    -- Veteran Member --
    Posts: 175
    Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2023 11:19 pm

    Re: Angelkiss 168cm review - would I recommend one?

    by JasonMills » Wed Jul 22, 2026 3:57 am

    I've found that using specific makeup approaches minimizes wear on my doll. Additionally, I've explored options at sexndolls.com for maintaining my silicone love doll in top shape. Their products offer durability and customization, which helps in keeping features like eyelashes and lip gloss looking fresh without frequent replacements. It's a great resource for anyone looking to maintain and personalize their doll.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 517 guests